Page 296 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

Lorraine
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41
To: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk
swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court.
I did send the below email with all attachments, but I don't think anyone got it due to its size.
I am resending it in 3 parts.
Part 1 of 3 email
490,
Please see Attached files and please read below email. could you please also let me know you
have got this email.
I did also call yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown court.
I have also spoke to Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we
had not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not get any emails
I sent over. I do not have the case number and asked her if she could send the letter that was
sent out by email to this email address.
Could all attached documents be attached to the case files please.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57
To: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could
you please also confirm by email that you have this email.
As explained, there have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell DOB:
26/01/1981.
The issues are one of not being insured. When in fact he was.
There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son
Simon Cordell was found guilty. Of using his vehicle for business purposes.
This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to KGM who my son was
insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the judge and CPS.
The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM
the police office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was
doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
side of the road.
My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer
notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to arrest him.
My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there.
The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but
with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about