Page 24 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

• Disrepair!
• The Asbo Order got granted in Error with Full Conditions against me and Fraudulently!
• The Banging at me got much worse!
• Debra Came Back and started again!
• Stain Came Back!

1
• My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! / Date+++
UPDATED FREEDOM OF INFORMATION RESULTS FROM ENFIELD COUNCIL/
Page Numbers: 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296
“Dear Ned Johnson, Thank you for the reply email and the update. I have other
information due to investigations I have done and due to speaking to people within the
area. That it was not just the one date in April 2014 there were events at Crown Road.
The dates I have been given that”

--

1
My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! / Date+++
UPDATED FREEDOM OF INFORMATION RESULTS FROM ENFIELD COUNCIL/
Page Numbers: 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296
From: Lorraine Cordell
To: "Ned Johnson"
Subject: RE: RE FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: 11 January 2016 15:25:00
Dear Ned Johnson,
Thank you for the reply email and the update.
I have other information due to investigations I have done and due to speaking to people
within the area. That it was not just the one date in April 2014 there were events at Crown
Road.
The dates I have been given that events took place at Crown Road are:
12th / 13th April 2014
19th / 20th April 2014 (confirmed)
26th / 27th April 2014
03rd / 04th May 2014
17th / 18th May 2014 (confirmed)
31st / 01st May and June 2014 (confirmed)
06th 07th 08th June 2014 (confirmed)
13th / 14th June 2014 (confirmed)
Some of these dates have already been given that events took place within the FOI I
requested.
Also you say you did not serve a Noise Abatement Notice on the squatters / occupiers, as it
would have had no benefit to do so as you would not have been able to take anyone to court,
and I do understand that the council was working with the owners of the building to deal with
this problem.
But I am sure if you had served a Noise Abatement Notice to the squatters / occupiers /
Building, it would have covered not just to take someone to court. It would have covered the
council to have seized sound equipment and due to this stopped the events far sooner with a
Noise Abatement Notice in place on the building then not having served one at all.