Page 26 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 26

I have a newspaper that is dated the 25/04/2014 which was printed after a 15-hour rave took
               place there on the 19/04/2014, which is much earlier than the 18/05/2014 as the date you
               gave me that this started.
               290,
               http://www.enfieldindependent.co.uk/news/11172103.Residents_fume_over_15 hour rave
               And one that was in printed on 9 September 2014 a paper saying The MAN building, in
               Crown Road, on the junction with Southbury Road, Enfield, has also been used for illegal
               raves and parties in the last few months which these words would say the events was going
               on much later than June 2014 that you have given in the FOI request.
               http://www.enfieldindependent.co.uk/news/11459487.Listed building wrecked by graffiti/
               I still also cannot understand why an abatement notice order was not put in place due to the
               number of events that took place there. I do understand on the days of the events it could be
               classed as unsafe due to the amount of people, but this site was being squatted and there
               would have been far less people there during the weeks when these events were not going on.
               And cannot understand why an abatement notice order was not put in place during the time
               when these events were not going on.
               On the 6th 07th and 08th June 2014 the council were aware an event was ongoing at Crown
               Road.
               On the 6th 07th and 08th June 2014 the council were aware an event was ongoing at Progress
               way.
               On the 08th June the council attended with police to Progress Way to serve paperwork this
               was not served to any persons within the site of Progress Way.
               But if you were with police, which your team was why was paperwork not tried to be served
               at Crown Road site also as your team was aware off an event also going on there.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               From: Ned Johnson [mailto:Ned.Johnson@enfield.gov.uk] Sent: 09 March 2015 12:21 To:
               Lorraine Cordell Cc: Esg Complaints
               Subject: RE: RE FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
               Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
               Dear Ms. Cordell,
               In terms of the number of events there was one further rave that took place on 25th March
               2013 at Progress Way, other than this occurrence I have provided you with the dates and
               locations of all the illegal raves/parties that are recorded on our database as well as all other
               data we hold that you requested. The rave on March 25th, 2013 was attended by the Out of
               Hours Noise Team, assistance was requested from the police but they were unable to help on
               that occasion.
               The events at Crown Road were over a period of several weeks not months, during which
               time we were in regular contact with the new site owners who worked to get the site secured
               and the power turned off. The Out of Hours Noise Team undertook observations of the noise
               during
               291,
               the event on May 31st/June 1st but did not visit the party as the team decided that it was
               unsafe to do so due to the nature and location of the event and provided information to the
               daytime officer who ensured the owners undertook the necessary works.
               The complaints received on Sunday June 8th were all received after the council's Out of
               Hours Service had finished at 03:00 and therefore no response was possible.
               The Out of Hours Team respond to all complaints received but will only visit a premise
               where it is safe for them to do so and in the case of illegal raves/parties quite often there are
               officer safety issues which prevent visits at night time during the event, unless police support
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31