Page 237 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half
P. 237

22/12/2015
                 22 December 2015
                 multiple texts and calls were made to the solicitor due to the
                 fact bundle needed to being to the Court by the
                 23/12/2015
                 23 December 2015
                 replies was not being made until much later in the day when
                 the solicitor stated that she could hand in the bundle when
                 she got back from the Christmas and New Year holidays, a
                 text was sent back stating that this was going to have an
                 effect on families Christmas and New Year due to The
                 Appellant knowing that the Court had ordered the bundle to
                 be submitted to the Court by a certain date, text was received
                 back from the solicitors stating to be at the office by 18:00
                 PM, The Appellants mother attended and two bundles was
                 Paginated and indexed which took until around 01:30 AM.
                 Miss Ward was not happy due to the time that had to be
                 spent dealing with this as she was due to fly out in the early
                 hours to Ireland. The bundles were left with The Appellants
                 mother so that one could be hand-delivered to the Court in
                 the morning on the
                 23/12/2015
                 23 December 2015
                 the other bundle was to be recorded delivered via the Post
                 Office to the police. Miss Ward stated after the Christmas
                 and New Year holidays she would get The Appellant’s
                 bundle ready so it could be given to him. The Appellant had
                 not seen the new bundle as the solicitor did not want to meet
                 him, and due to the lateness in which the bundle was made
                 to get into the court and the police there was not time for
                 The Appellant to see the new bundle. One of the texts that
                 were sent to the Appellants mother stated on the
                 22/12/2015
                 was please see below.
                 This is a legal aid case Mother! and Simon need to recognise
                 that he is not paying privately so needs to work within the
                 constraints of the legal aid system.” Upon receiving this The
                 Appellants mother was upset, it was the Court has set the
                 day for the bundle to be with the Court not The Appellant, if
                 the solicitors had dealt with the case in a timely manner and
                 things would not have been left to the last minute which
                 always was, all The Appellant ever wanted was for the
                 solicitors to do what was needed for the case which never
                 happened things was always left and things not done, and
                 then The Appellant seem to get the blame. It was also
                 upsetting because it seemed as if The Appellant paid for the
                 solicitors services then things would have been addressed a
                 lot differently, I feel it should make no difference between
                 paying privately or having legal aid put in place a solicitors
                 job is to represent their client to the best of their ability seek
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242