Page 241 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

witnesses cannot be called. As to say it is not in the interests
of justice to do so.
HHJ-PAWLAK granted the hearsay application could be
submitted, although opposed orally by Mr Morris.
HHJ-PAWLAK informed that Mr Morris opposition to
hearsay was contained in Mr Morris legal document, for
which The Appellant did not allow Mr Morris to hand up.
HHJ-PAWLAK is informed that client wishes to hand up his
own document to HHJ-PAWLAK against Mr Morris advice.
Document read by all sides.
Please see The Appellant document Considering in point 5
of the Judges letter to The Appellant Acting solicitors how
was this allowed the Judge allowed Mr Morris to make oral
submissions in regards to hearsay in Court yet then said they
were not allowed and granted the hearsay application as
allowed. Michael Carroll and Co had also not done or
prepared a skeleton argument for The Appellant’s bundle,
the Judge stated that the letter that had been handed in could
be used as The Appellant’s skeleton argument. Miss Ward
was sitting in the back of the Court taking notes of what was
being asked by the Judge and what was being said.
A meeting was meant to be arranged with The Appellant and
the Public defender Mr Morris; this was not done.
On the
12/07/2016
Informed by solicitor via email: Please note that Mr Andrew
Locke has returned from a career sabbatical and he has
agreed to deal with the Appeal against the imposition of an
ASBO. I am in the process of confirming a conference date
with Mr Locke, hopefully within the next two weeks. I have
notified Mr Morris from the Public Defender Service that Mr
Locke is your preferred choice and I have requested the
written submissions that he had prepared for the mention
hearing in
00/04/2016
April 2016
that you did not consent to or permit us to serve upon the
prosecution, instead your own document was served at your
insistence and contrary to the advice given by both Mr
Andrew Morris and myself. Please confirm any dates that
you are not available so that this conference can be arranged.
I have requested previously the complete list of witnesses
that you now insist on calling and specifying their relevance
to the ASBO Appeal and the issues as to whether you were
an organiser of illegal raves. I cannot advise on whether the
witnesses are relevant to an issue in the Appeal without you
confirming the list and specifying their relevance.”
Take out does not need to be included: --
The meeting was never arranged with Mr Locke, The
Appellant barrister until just before the Appeal dates