Page 259 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half
P. 259

licensed premises and someone wanted to hire the services
                 of The Appellant The Appellant would not be able to do this.
                 The Appellant was also offered contracts within two
                 nightclubs to be the manager if The Appellant was again
                 offered contracts within nightclubs or late-night bars The
                 Appellant would not be able to accept these contracts. I
                 cannot even say why condition 5 has been imposed because
                 condition 4 conflicts with condition 5 in certain parts and
                 who would want to hire or take on The Appellant if he had
                 to ask for written permission which would be degrading for
                 The Appellant to have to ask each time he wanted to go
                 somewhere or had a contact and had to explain why he
                 needed it to be confirmed in writing by the owner and/or
                 leaseholder of the property,   These are just a few concerns
                 with the conditions that the Appellant is under; there is other
                 concerns with other conditions set at by the Courts that are
                 of concern. When the Appeal hearing was over the
                 conditions was not served on The Appellant, they were
                 posted to him in the post. The Appellant mother has put an
                 application into the Crown Court on forms EX-105 and EX-
                 107 requesting the Tape/Disc Transcription for all hearings,
                 and is waiting to hear back from the court, to see if it will be
                 granted. The Appellant mother has also put an application
                 into the police under a subject access request to get all The
                 Appellant history with the police which will show the data
                 protection errors and more data that has been inputted
                 incorrectly by the police, it will also show a history of  how
                 much the police does not leave The Appellant alone.  Also,
                 how many complaints has had to be put into the police
                 regarding how the police have treated The Appellant over
                 many years which when asked in this ASBO application
                 case by the judge was any of this the truth they replied no to.
                 The Judge also asked if anyone else had had an ASBO
                 application against them for an ASBO on the dates held
                 within the ASBO application, the Judge did not get a reply
                 and it was not asked again. The police have not only done
                 this to The Appellant but The Appellant whole family so
                 each family member have requested their records. So far, the
                 police have refused The Appellant application and his
                 brothers, they have allowed The Appellant mother and The
                 Appellant sister but only part of the information has been
                 supplied. This has been passed to the ICO to address, but
                 due to the backlog the ICO has we have not been told a
                 timeframe this will take. At this time there is also complaint
                 still ongoing with the Appellant and the police and The
                 Appellant brother with the police. It is also noticed that some
                 of the police in this application who have done statements in
                 this ASBO have complaint still standing against them, with
                 The Appellant brother complaint.  But until we get all the
                 data, we have requested there could be more police officers
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264