Page 258 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

period: This would include hospitals, police stations, 24-
hour supermarkets, petrol stations, cinemas, restaurants,
bars, night clubs and any other public place open to the
public between these times that is non-residential The
Appellant would only have a 30 minute window to be able to
enter any non-residential building, however is not feasible
that within 30 minutes The Appellant could be seen in a
hospital within 30 minutes, how would it be feasible if the
Appellant went to dinner at a restaurant they would be
completed within 30 minutes, how would it be feasible if
The Appellant wanted to go to a nightclub or late-night bar
as it would only have 30 minutes, places that are open to the
public should not be restricted to the Appellant how is the
Appellant meant to have a normal family life. The Appellant
cannot go to without written permission which would be
degrading for The Appellant to have to ask each time he
wanted to go somewhere and explain why he needed it to be
confirmed in writing by the owner and/or leaseholder of the
property, how this condition could be applied by any Judge
and state it is not a beach of someone human rights is
beyond me.
Conditions 2 states knowingly using or supplying property
personal or otherwise for the use of a rave as defined under
section 63.1 of the criminal justice and public order act, The
Appellants has spent the last 10 years building his business
saving every penny and help from family it is within the
entertainment industry, he will hires equipment out and his
services, The Appellants business would seriously be
affected, because if he hired his equipment and it ended up
in an illegal rave The Appellant would be in breach of the
conditions. When hiring out equipment you do asked what is
going to be used for, and you do have a contract that is in
place, but what the person tells you their reason for hiring
the equipment out is not always the correct reason and is not
used for the purpose the person told you The Appellant
would be in breach of these conditions also if The Appellant
loaned someone any personal belongings and that person
ended up at an illegal rave then The Appellant would again
be in breach of his conditions, even if the item was
something that did not even constitute as being for an illegal
rave.
Conditions 5 states; provide any service in respect of any
licensable activity’s in an unlicensed, premises. How is The
Appellant meant to run his business, The Appellant would
not be able to obtain a licence that has already been clarified
by the police and councils due to the Antisocial Behaviour
Order that is in place, The Appellant would not be able to
offer his services also due to the restriction that he has only
30 minutes within a non-residential building, most events go
to the late hours in the morning so even if there was a