Page 294 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

Though the case history multiple documents had been handed to the Court, and them
documents did not get patronised correctly or indexed into The Appellant’s bundles, this
includes the court and the Respondent bundles that they were using also.
A whole weekend was spent trying to add missing documents to the Appellant’s bundle and
making copies so that on the Court date of the 26-09-2016; any missing files could be added
to the Respondent bundle and the three Judge’s bundles. The Appellant health had become
very unstable due to him knowing that he was going to have to be dealing with this
158,
himself.
The Appellant mother also spent part of the weekend also writing a letter to the Judge in
regards to what had gone on with the breaches in The Appellant’s human rights, his article 6
human rights the Applicants rights to a fair and speedy trial, there were also a list of other
things that had gone on throughout the case since 2014 in regards to the nondisclosure, and
other issues that was always being raised when at Court and the reason as to why legal aid
had been granted:
Due to the complexity of the case.
Due to The Appellant’s learning difficulties.
Due to the concerns of The Appellant health.
This letter was emailed to the Court and asked to be passed to the Judge.
Please see letter that was emailed to the judge
The 26 September 2016 the three-day Appeal hearing was due to start, The Appellant was so
unwell that there was no way he could attend Court, Mr A Cordell and Miss L Cordell
attended Court to speak to the Judge, when the Judge entered the Courtroom he stated that he
had received a letter that had to be addressed, he stated that he felt this would go to judicial
review, he stated he had three options:
Carry on with the Appeal in the hope that The Appellant would turn up the following day.
159,
To Dismiss the Appeal.
Adjourn the Appeal to a new date.
The Judge went over the letter in great detail; he started around five times that he felt that this
case was going to go to judicial review.
The Judge decided to adjourn the case until the 16/01/2017; this was later changed for the
Appeal to start on the 17/01/2017. The Respondent had tried to object to the Appeal being
adjourned. The Judge stated that we should try to find a new solicitor to take on the Appeal
and that he would help and also make sure that legal aid was in place.
The Judge asked why The Appellant was not in Court. The Appellant mother stated The
Appellant had become so unwell due to what was going on in this case and that he was not
coping. Information was passed to the Judge that showed The Appellant was unwell.
Mentioned in court; was also the missing documents that was missing from The Appellant’s
bundle, and that there were no statements within the bundle, my mother stated to the Judge
that she had spent a lot of the weekend trying to update The Appellant’s bundle and make
sure that it was indexed correctly,

42.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
42. 1. 2.
Asbo Rewired -1-4820 26-04-2017 18-58
26/04/2017
/ Page Numbers: 160,161,162