Page 296 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

13. The ongoing of the Asbo case are a clear miscarriage of justice that has been allowed to
happen, even once reported.
14. The Appellant's rights in the data protection act 1998 have also been breached in relation
towards the ongoings of the Anti-Social Behaviour order.
15. The Appellant requests for the decision/order made at Wood Green Crown Court on 19th
January 2017 in relation to the Appeal against conviction, of the Antisocial Behaviour Order
to be dismissed also.
16. The Appellant asks for the case to be reopened and reviewed in its decision that is made
by order of the Magistrates Court, so for the verdict to be overturned in his favour to be
declared as void making the decision an error in law.
17. The Appellant's human rights have now been breached. And.
18. The Appellant's right to due process has also been breached. This led to the Appellant's
right to a fair trial also being breached.
19. The ongoing of the Asbo case are a clear miscarriage of justice that has been allowed to
happen, even once reported.
20. The Appellant's rights in the data protection act 1998 have also been breached in relation
towards the ongoings of the Anti-Social Behaviour order.
21. It is said that on the on the 12th September 2014 the police attended The Appellant home
address of 109 Burncroft, Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JQ, they knocked on the door, the
Appellant was not expecting anyone, the Appellant approached his front door and looked
through his spy hole he could see people who appeared to be police officers, and asked them
through the door what they wanted, the police stated they needed to speak to him, the
Appellant opened his front door very slightly then the police officers started to try a force an
object into the front door, he soon came to the understanding he was being tricked so for the
officers to be able to serve some
161,
documents on him as they would never have been able to fit into any standard letterbox, due
to the Appellant's learning difficulties he stated he would not accept anything and closed his
door and then continued to state that he was not being rude in doing so.
22. It is a well-known fact on the police's system of government bodies that the Appellant
does have learning difficulties and health problems.
23. The Appellant could hear the police talking outside his front door and the lady police
officer then questioned her colleges and said what shall we do now, a male police officer
stated put it on the floor in front of the door referring to the application.
24. They then put some other pages into the Appellant's letterbox this totalled to four pages.
The lady police officer then placed an A4 size folder on the floor outside the Appellant's front
door as the male officer had instructed her to do.
25. The Appellant then made a phone call to his mother, who could not attend at the time this
was until the following day when she attended the Appellant's home address. On her
attendance, she found the folder was left opened on the floor where the police had left it. The
Appellant’s mother was very shocked when she looked inside the folder and saw the data that
was within it.
26. The data that was within side the A4 size folder was personal information and a breach of
the data protection act 1998 by leaving such data in a commune area of the block of flats.
27. A letter of complaint was put to the police in the way in which they had left personal
information on a doorstep in view of everyone that lived or who came into the block of flats,
this was achieved on the 13th September 2014 and was hand delivered to Edmonton Green
police station and a receipt was issued from them, at the same time as of when the complaint
letter was handed in there was also that of the A4 bundle being referred to as the Asbo