Page 234 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

Inc Location: SOUTHBURY Rd/CROWN ROAD
Map: Page 082, Grid Reference 534960,196240
GPA: YP [Division: YE: JC]
Call Location: 93, BROADLANDS AVENUE, ENFIELD
Map: Page 082, Grid Reference 534981,196790
GPA: YF [Division: YE: SX]
As we can see all the Grid Reference have been left in this one by mistake, I believe, once
again any police officer would know 93, BROADLANDS AVENUE, ENFIELD is behind
Crown Road, so in fact this CAD cannot belong to Progress Way.
2232
214,
Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
But this CAD tells us even more as there is a safety risk with it regarding a fragile roof, and
subsequently gives details in regard to door numbers along Southbury Road and Crown Road.
This also links to CAD number 3319. There is no mistaking this CAD links to the event that
was ongoing at Crown Road. The police deny this they state no event was ongoing, yet it is a
known fact the building was along Crown road/Southbury Road have fragile roofs, the old
man building has partly a glass roof.
These are just a few CADs that prove there was an ongoing event at Crown Road, it is also
proven in the FOI request I put into Enfield Council, there is also a substantial amount of
information within the intelligence reports that do not correspond in the way in which they
should do, there is also errors within the timeline of some of the CADs, I do not see why the
police have mislead the courts, the only reason is most of the information the police had
related to Progress Way.
Also the witness statements that was taken by police are meant to be written in the words of
the witness signed and dated by the witness, all but one witness statement has been written
and signed by police officers, not one witness statement identifies the claimant or a
description, under the law I witness statement should be completed and signed and dated by
the witness.
Now as said before I have done a lot of research, and I now put it to the police they knew full
well my son had not done what they said he had done in this case. And that the police were
hiding information.
Progress Way Event was relocated to Progress Way; the Metropolitan police know this
already, but yet blame my son.
The location that this was meant to have happened In Essex a very senior police officer was
being updated in regard to this event, due to the Essex police monitoring the event page on
social media for some time, due to the brief location on the event page on social media, the
very senior police officer was concerned due to it being very close with the border to the
Metropolitan police area.
The very senior police officer due to being concerned contacted the Metropolitan police,
information was given to the Metropolitan police in regards to the concerns with this event
and area, there was information given so that the Metropolitan police could monitor the event
page on social media, the senior officer asked for information of a senior officer within the
Metropolitan police that would be on duty the full weekend the event was due to take place
so that contact could be made regarding this.
On the 06th June 2014 the Very senior police officer sent police to look for the location
within the border of Essex, the police found the location this event was going to be taking
place. Once the very senior police officer got the location, he went in a police helicopter and
went to the location and landed in the field.