Page 351 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All
P. 351

during a telephone conversation between her, myself and mother that
                 she overheard me threaten her by saying 'I'm going to do her over' and
                 then 'I'm going to take her job just for fun'.
                 This is not true
                 The reason that it is not true is because what has now been stated to
                 have occurred is more than just misinterpreted information of the so
                 called Mid – day event.
                 The Council’s memo of a telephone call on that day:
                 Is  forged  and  therefore  incorrect  and  is  not  supported  by  self  and
                 mother to be true facts that have been documented with a fair prosses
                 by  the  statement  maker.  The  context  contained  within  side  the
                 statement had been fabricated so to support the claimants claim.
                 While also set out to avoid displinary action for the statement makers
                 and hardworking colleague’s incompetence leading to negligence and
                 gross misconduct, set out against myself and then on afterwards having
                 a negative effect also within my loved one’s life’s.
                 All what has been achieved by the Enfield Council since the start of
                 my official complaint to themselves has gotten managed with criminal
                 intention to put I in harm’s way
                 From the of start of themselves handling my case load of an official
                 work load.
                 Sarah Fletcher as mentioned whom once was a neighbourhood officer
                 who did work in collaboration with the Enfield Council, states that she
                 received a call from Mr. Simon Paul Cordell
                 Whom is an Enfield secure resident within his housing tenancy that is
                 attached to the address of 109 Burncroft Avenue at around the time of
                 Mid – Day: 01:20Pm?
                 The  time  that  Sarah  Fletcher  states  she  received  the  phone  call  is
                 incorrect but not by far even low it is still 100% incorrect. I and my
                 Mother am sure of this as we cared very much so when deciding to
                 make the phone call to my housing officer that we both documented
                 down all relevant information accurately.
                 When doing so we noted down the precise time of 01:04Pm
                 I did get transferred by customer services when making the phone call
                 to my housing officer about the way I was getting victimised, this did
                 not take too long.
                 Once on the phone to Sarah Fletcher I started to explain to her a shorted
                 down list of emergency issues that I was having wile renting my home.
                 1.  That my mother had been contacting her and her team, while also
                 contacting other official persons with relevance since the date of
                 00/00/2015
                 And this had continued up a till date and without any fair follow up’s
                 as company protocol states is mandatory.
                 And due to this lack of concern I had continued to suffer for a much
                 further time frame than ever would have been if her and other persons
                 jobs were followed correctly.
                 2.
                 3.
                 4.
                 5.
   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356