Page 158 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

427. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell
/ Page Numbers: 1342,1343,1344,1345,1346,1347,1348,
1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 26 January 2015 23:10
To: 'Wood, Peter'
Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com'
Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Peter Wood
Thank you for picking this up and taking the time to deal with this matter. The date of the
appeal I do not have yet. I are waiting for this but the court and CPS said if I get the
information needed before the court date then it could be sent to the court who found me
guilty and the CPS and this would be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there
should be no need for the appeal court case. I am trying to do this so that a next day is not got
to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and from the court. The day that the police
officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer lied, and
the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013. I think due to what
the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the facts and what the
police officer said on that phone call to KGM. In addition, when KGM spoke to the manager
at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I think the reason for this is
the police officer committed perjury in the court. That is why they asked me to get proof that
my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to what the police officer told
KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, In addition, the facts how KGM found out I
had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance should not be cancelled. However, if you
think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, I would be
very grateful, but could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. In addition, this is the
reason KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance policy I
had in force with them. This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong and Kelly
Tiller knows the police officer lied to get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police
compound and they told her there was no tools. The vehicle registration I was driving on the
14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included on my insurance. So, should have
shown on the database along with my car. However, none showed up as being insured on the
MID database, this is what has caused me all the problems with the police. As already aware
yes, I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the some of
them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the vehicle out of the compound
for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013. I have the ones for the
08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 I just need to get the receipts for the other
dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no insurance from the police
compound. As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most grateful that this is being
addressed. If I had known a fee was, needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no
one getting back to me
1343,
about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed.
Regards
Simon Cordell
From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694