Page 159 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

Dear Mr Cordell,
Unfortunately, Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. The first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case,
can you confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? My thought is that we
provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that you had a valid policy in force
between said dates and on what vehicles, this should satisfy the Courts but if they need
anything else, we will be happy to assist, just let me know what you require. I understand you
were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in the process of obtaining
evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs incurred by you as a result for us to consider
compensation. When you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as
possible. There is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. I have spent some
time today tracking down recorded calls and various communications and hove notified our
Data Protection Officer of your request. I can see that you have made a request, any request
should correctly be sent on for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10
fee. Your request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. The underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. This was not done for which I must
apologise, as a result we will waive the fee requirement and I would confirm this is now in
hand. We have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you we will
do this as soon as we have received your response to the above points.
Regards
Peter Wood
UK Specialty Operations Manager |
UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk
www.canopius.com
From: Lorraine
1344,1345,1346,1347,1348,1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355,

The banging Started!
Debbie Andrews (responsible)
Stain Curtis (responsible)
Mathiyalagan (Responsible)
All-Day and All-Night!
Under-protected is what I know I am because of them!
The Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes employees aloud the occupiers of 117 and 113
and 111 Continued to victimizing me by
113 and 117 started Jumping up and down on the floor above where ever they can tell that I
am present below!
Damaging my work studies on purpose!
Debbie bangs when she is drunk with the occupiers of 117 the Mathiyalagan family and also
Stain Curtis off 111 Burncroft Avenue and continue to Slamming the water tap on and off,
causing damage to my health and the buildings fixtures at an unacceptable rate!
All day and night Stain continued to bang on the kitchen wall for hours again at me!
At the night time Stain played with his front door locks to try and scare me!

Si Note:
1