Page 322 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

Subject: RE: MT3574694
Dear Mr Cordell,
file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba...
06/02/2015
520+,
Page 322 of 21
I have detailed the process for requesting information under the subject access request and if
you wish to proceed with this please confirm.
In the meantime I am keen to assist you if I can in confirming when cover was in force.
Please can you confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a
time that is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for you.
I look forward to hearing from you with this information.
Regards,
Andrew Austin
Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance
Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ
D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 |
M 07469 147743 |
http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk | <http://www.canopius.com/>
www.canopius.com
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22
To: Austin, Andrew
Cc: complaints@lloyds.com
Subject: RE: MT3574694
Dear Andrew
I will forward this to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a full print
out as to all the tickets as I believe there is a few missing.
I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized I also do have court
letters, and letters from DVLA, which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in
so please give me a few days and I will get
file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba...
06/02/2015
521+,
Page 322 of 21
back to you with this information as there is a lot of data.
The main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was sized due to
the police lying and me being found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30
November 2014 about what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found
guilty and about the appeal.
This data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 I put in, so was wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I have already sent 3 in so to do a
4th I do not feel I should need to do.
KGM have in fact not followed the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this
with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to
stop the information I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no
insurance.