Page 319 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 319

I am trying to do this so that a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting
               to and from the court.
               The day that the police officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the
               police officer lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is
               14/11/2013.
               file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba...
               06/02/2015
               516+,
               Page 319 of21
               I think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the
               facts and what the police officer said on that phone call to KGM. In addition, when KGM
               spoke to the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I
               think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the court.
               That is why they asked me to get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness
               statements as to what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance,
               In addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance
               should not be cancelled.
               However, if you think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be
               done I would be very grateful, but could you include in the letter only reason this has come
               about is due to what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. In addition,
               this is the reason KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the
               insurance policy I had in force with them.
               This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police
               officer lied to get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
               her there was no tools.
               The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was
               included on my insurance. So should have shown on the database along with my car.
               However, none showed up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me
               all the problems with the police.
               As already aware yes, I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized.
               I do have some of the some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get
               the vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013.
               I have the ones for the 08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 I just need to get the
               receipts for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no
               insurance from the police compound.
               As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. If I
               had known a fee was, needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting
               back to me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed.
               Regards
               Simon Cordell
               From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
               Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19
               To: Lorraine Cordell
               Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694
               Dear Mr Cordell,
               Unfortunately Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
               picked this matter up.
               The first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm when
               the date has been set for the hearing please? My thought is that we provide a Letter of
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324