Page 48 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the police said I had tools
in my van I went to court with all my documents but due to not having the information I had
asked for from KGM many times about that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about
the whole policy with KGM. I have put an appeal in and this case will be going to crown
court I have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need to be
addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one
that I will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and
1276,
the 1st Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998
about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about more
than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I will ask the court to summon the
people at KGM to deal with this matter as they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong
and the police lied. All I have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons
people this way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the other
information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not
want to do anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance and
the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could
say about the insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not drive so
could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the information over that was
needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that has been
sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and
time due to this insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. All the loss of
work due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and all the times I have had to
go to court for no insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points put on my driving
licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine
Cordell has also written many of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue.
Regards
Simon Cordell
1277,
Confidentiality Caution
The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius
may monitor the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a
member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered
number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited |
registered number 02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is
a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office:
Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales
Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and
notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. E-