Page 128 - 7. 2016 Last three months the 10 - 11 - 12 No Table

(I) To make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) To cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2) A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his
conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.
Issue of the Word “Illegal being Used: -
The second issue is the terminology regarding the word “illegal” the word Illegal
also raises concerns of issues relating towards what the respondent’s case has been
brought in motion for, all of the accused incidents that the respondent has alleged I
took an organisation (role / or supplied equipment in, do in fact relate to the
entertainment industry, what is governed under the licensing act 2003.
As previously stated in this letter of concern, all incidents sighted in the Antisocial
Behaviour Order (ASBO) application do in fact relate to indoor private events and
trespass has not been investigated under any police
436,
officer’s codes of conduct, neither does the CPS challenge or dispute this fact, so
there is no argument to the issue of illegality under the trespass grounds.
This only leaves the licensing act 2003 having to be found in breach to prove the
word illegal in the entertainment industry when a police officer is in pursuit of a
case relating to the investigation of the organisation of illegal raves, as the
respondent and officers have pro claimed it to be.
When reading a copy of the licensing act 2003 as amended on the 7th January
2013 for the processes of creation of an investigation or defence towards a
person’s rights, any person doing so will have to take note to appendix four of that
Act, which clearly states it is not illegal to provide any entertainment within a back
garden or place of residence, in fact the only clause relating to in private air is that
no person shall have the right to charge for money with a few of making a profit
and if a profit is made without true intention then the licensing act 2003 has no
breach, with this full and whole understanding I believe that any person will agree
that the respondent does not have the right to base their case on the fact of
organising an illegal rave as no illegal concept has been adduced to be proven.
Issues of the Word “Illegal being Used: -
As a third concern regarding the issue of the word “illegal being used does also
make me take reference to the following:
From the early stages of the application the Appellant felt the need to defend his
legal Rights, as any other member of united kingdom and associated treaties
should also do, this being said to be leading towards the wrongful accusations
against any illegal allegations of criminal nature that any person(s) find themselves
in defence towards, that any person(s) know they have not committed, neither am I
in the wrong for just simply not understanding the crime I am being accused of but
still playing a role in such criminal activities in turn as a figure of speech being
blind towards my own actions and there consequences, such as the incident that
have clearly been contained within the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO)
application.
I know it would be morally wrong for me not to stand up and quire this matter
myself as for I know the true facts, as I know this case should not be sitting in its
civil capacity, when it clearly states an offence of an illegal natured concept this is
a breach of a multitude of my human rights and should be managed under criminal
legalisation and regulations in a criminal court, especially without no previous
history of similar natured offences being present and this is also inclusive of no pre
remand warnings ever being issued. In the understanding of civil and criminal law,