Page 132 - 7. 2016 Last three months the 10 - 11 - 12 No Table

In dispute to the Organisation role in the respondent’s pursuit for a convection
for organising illegal raves, the applicant has not adduced no evidence in support
of such a claim, I submitted a plea of innocents as for sure I know that I am
innocent and because of that reason, there is no truthful evidence relating to the
wrongful accusations that I find myself defending my character towards, this case
leaves me every day of my life knowing that I never organised any event sighted
in the respondent bundle leaving me suffering the consequences and if the
allegations were true I believe the police intelligence would be able to prove
some of the following as they have not got the following:
• No evidence of flyers,
• No evidence of breaches of the licensing act.
• No evidence of promotion on Social Networking Sites
• No evidence of Sound equipment sited within the Antisocial Behaviour Order
(ASBO) event dates being used for private reasons, neither seized under self-
commercial gain.
• No evidence of Video footage proving any origination or delegation roles.
• No evidence of forensics.
• No evidence of trespass.
• No evidence of Voice recordings.
• No evidence of a past duration of time, relating to any arrest of my person of
a similar natured offence.
• No evidence of and therefore a complete absinth of firsthand oral evidence of
victims.
• This complete absinth also includes no police PNB notebooks, for all dates
wrongfully accused and sited within the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO)
application.
• Not to forget the complete disappearance of all CAD related emergency 999 /
101 calls, that I am in pursuit of disclosure towards, that do relate to the audio
voice recordings that have been said to have been destroyed by police, the
emergency 999 / 101 call voice recordings are governed by United Kingdom
and continental legalisation and Standard Functional Specifications for Law
Enforcement Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Systems standards protected
by communication standard operating procedures “SOP” and in all incidents
should not be destroyed when they are part of an ongoing trial or appeal and
this is to include, the commence of a Proven verdict otherwise known as a
convection as them files should remain intact for up to 50 years after.
Hearsay I challenge the following points of concern: -
The respondent when seeking pursuit of the Asbo application that was applied at
the lower court in conjunction to their powers, so for the respondent to Adduce
an application notice of (Hearsay Evidence under Civil Proceeding) Rule 1999.
The applicant took dispute to the legal factors of such a hearsay notice and
declined the application.
The reason for the dispute was and is that the respondent is relying on the whole
president of their case solely being based on hearsay evidence, with no substance
of firsthand evidence and a complete disappearance of civil
person(s) under oath supplying oral evidence, in turn no VPS witness, this does
also include any other support of key materials that would aid in any convection
as evidence.