Page 245 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

in regards to the disclosure. Ms Ward stated she could not
remember, The Appellant mother being dumbfounded by
this said you was sitting in the back of the Court room taking
notes, and only last week said to The Appellant mother again
The Appellant should have everything that the Judge had
asked for in his original disclosure plus what was asked for
in The Appellant letter that was handed to the judge and also
the Judge had made other addictions. At no point did Ms
Ward ever make The Appellant mother feel she did not
know what was due to be disclosed, if she had have done
this The Appellant and The Appellant mother would have
asked her to relist this to the Court and asked for this to be
clarified. As the disclosure that we were asking for was very
important to the Appeal. The Appellant mother then handed
The Appellant the phone The Appellant asked Ms Ward
about the letter I was supposed to have sent to the Court and
the prosecuting barrister, The Appellant was still thinking
we was talking about the letter handed to the Judge on the
04/04/2016
which in Court on this date it was also said The Appellant
had wrote this letter myself, which was not the case.
The Appellant agreed on this date for the letter that Miss
Ward had wrote in replied to the Judge letter that The
Appellant had amended was to be handed in to the court,
The Appellant solicitor was at Court so knew The Appellant
amended letter was being handed in to the court, It was at
this point The Appellant said she had drafted the letter and
The Appellant had only amended it, she at this said she did
not draft the Letter and The Appellant wrote it, at this The
Appellant did call Miss ward a lair as The Appellant knew
Miss Ward drafted the letter and said to Miss ward on the
phone, I can prove it I have the email you sent to me and my
mother.
(Since Court the Appellant mother has checked the dates for
when this letter was drafted by The Appellant solicitor and
this was on the
03/04/2016
please see attached email and letter (marked
03/04/2016
Ms Ward).
The Appellant barrister was listening to the phone call and
after The Appellant ended the barrister got up and said I will
need to think about still representing you as you called your
solicitors a lair, The Appellant stated that he can prove that
Miss Ward wrote the letter and she’s denying as to doing so,
how would anyone feel that she had not lied, The Appellant
barrister then replied if he was still going to represent The
Appellant then there would need a meeting at The Appellant
barrister chambers, at this point the meeting concluded with
nothing really spoke of about The Appellant Appeal yet