Page 242 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

services from any shop or garage or fuel supplier which is open to the public at such times.
Then in such event, you may enter but you must not remain on such property for longer than
30 minutes and you may do so on only one occasion during each separate nine-hour period
between 22:00 and 07:00 daily.
With this condition in place any non-residential property The Appellant would not be able to
attend only for 30 minutes on one occasion during a separate nine-hour period:
This would include hospitals, police stations, 24-hour supermarkets, petrol stations, cinemas,
restaurants, bars, night clubs and any other public place open to the public between these
times that is non-residential The Appellant would only have a 30 minute window to be able to
enter any non-residential building, however is not feasible that within 30 minutes The
Appellant could be seen in a hospital within 30 minutes, how would it be feasible if The
Appellant went to dinner at a restaurant they would be completed within 30 minutes, how
would it be feasible if The Appellant wanted to go to a nightclub or late-night bar as it would
only have 30 minutes, places that are open to the public should not be restricted to The
Appellant how is The Appellant meant to have a normal family life. The Appellant cannot go
to without written permission which would be degrading for The Appellant to have to ask
each time he wanted to go somewhere and explain why he needed it to be confirmed in
writing by the owner and/or leaseholder of the property, how
2240
224,
Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
this condition could be applied by any Judge and state it is not a beach of someone human
rights is beyond me.
Conditions 2 states knowingly using or supplying property personal or otherwise for the use
of a rave as defined under section 63.1 of the criminal justice and public order act,
The Appellants has spent the last 10 years building his business saving every penny and help
from family it is within the entertainment industry, he will hires equipment out and his
services, The Appellants business would seriously be affected, because if he hired his
equipment and it ended up in an illegal rave The Appellant would be in breach of the
conditions. When hiring out equipment you do ask what it is going to be used for, and you do
have a contract that is in place, but what the person tells you their reason for hiring the
equipment out is not always the correct reason and is not used for the purpose the person told
you The Appellant would be in breach of these conditions. Also if The Appellant loaned
someone any personal belongings and that person ended up at an illegal rave then The
Appellant would again be in breach of his conditions, even if the item was something that did
not even constitute as being for an illegal rave.
Conditions 5 states provide any service in respect of any licensable activity in an unlicensed
premise.
How is The Appellant meant to run his business, The Appellant would not be able to obtain a
licence that has already been clarified by the police and councils due to the Antisocial
Behaviour Order that is in place, The Appellant would not be able to offer his services also
due to the restriction that he has only 30 minutes within a non-residential building, most
events go to the late hours in the morning so even if there was a licensed premises and
someone wanted to hire the services of The Appellant The Appellant would not be able to do
this. The Appellant was also offered contracts within two nightclubs to be the manager if The
Appellant was again offered contracts within nightclubs or late-night bars The Appellant
would not be able to accept these contracts. I
2240
225,