Page 225 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 225

corrected and our policy history was confusing due to the incorrect Clio that I was not
                   aware of previously.
               •  You are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see that they
                   instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault Clio that was added in error following
                   receipt of advices from Broadsure. I can amend the comment in the letter to show that this
                   vehicle was added to the policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
                   registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy with this?
               •  The letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade Use. Motor
                   Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in connection
                   with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used for any other purposes
                   such as perhaps, paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except
                   auto electrical) and so on. This is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this
                   statement in the letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point?
               •  The Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to drive
                   around doing “odd jobs”. Later in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered
                   “to drive around doing jobs”. I sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the
                   tone of the enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
                   Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. If the question
                   had been more specific with the officer stating that Simon had tools connected with the
                   Motor Trade in the vehicle would he be covered – Yes. If he said that the tools were not
                   connected to the Motor Trade (as per my comments above) then the answer is – No. Not
                   something I can put into a Letter of Indemnity but certainly something to be argued with
                   the CPS/Courts.
               •  I’m happy to confirm in the letter that cover was in force under this policy on the
                   14/11/2013. Once I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI accordingly and e‐mail it
                   across for you to sign off, I will also send an original in the post just in case!
               1465,
               If you need anything else please do not hesitate to drop me and Andy a line, I am keeping
               Andy in the loop as I will be on leave from 12/2/15 – 9/3/15 so he will need to deal with
               anything in my absence.
               Regards
               Peter Wood
               UK Specialty Operations Manager |
               UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
               KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
               D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com
               From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
               Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47
               To: Wood, Peter
               Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
               Dear Peter
               Thank you very much for the information you have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of
               Indemnity.
               Ford Zetec registration MA47LDY
               • Ford Transit registration CX52JRZ
               On the 8/4/13 at 11.05am the following vehicle was added to the policy –
               • Renault Clio registration NA57LDY.
               Ford Zetec registration MA47LDY
               Renault Clio registration NA57LDY
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230