Page 227 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Peter
Thank you for the reply to my email. Yes, the below would cover everything I feel, so if you
can go ahead and do this, I would be most grateful. As said, I just do not want any way that
the CSP and Court could have any confusion with anything.
Regards
Lorraine
From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 02 February 2015 14:56
To: Lorraine Cordell
Cc: Austin, Andrew
Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Lorraine,
Thanks for your comments, don’t worry I want to get this resolved as much as you and
Simon, it’s taken far too long already, so before I send an amended Indemnity Letter (LOI)
please confirm my understanding as listed
below –
• I will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec to show MA57LDY. Broadsure originally
gave us the incorrect registration and as you say it was a while before this error was
corrected and our policy history was confusing due to the incorrect Clio that I was not
aware of previously.
• You are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see that they
instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault Clio that was added in error following
receipt of advices from Broadsure. I can amend the comment in the letter to show that this
vehicle was added to the policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy with this?
• The letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade Use. Motor
Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in connection
with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used for any other purposes
such as perhaps, paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except
auto electrical) and so on. This is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this
statement in the letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point?
• The Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to drive
around doing “odd jobs”. Later in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered
“to drive around doing jobs”. I sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the
tone of the enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. If the question
had been more specific with the officer stating that
1484,1485,1486,1487,1488,1489,1490,1491,1492,1493,
1494,1495,1496,1497,1498,1499,1500,1501,

53.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
1. 53
Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.02.2015_RE MT3574694 Simon Cordell
02/02/2015
/ Page Numbers: 434,435,436,437,438
439,440,441,442,443,444
445,446,447,448,449,450