Page 224 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half
P. 224
This application is to have the following decisions/orders
reviewed and reversed.
The decision/order to make an application for an Interim
Antisocial Behaviour Order against The Appellant on
05/11/2014
05th November 2014
at Highbury Corner by Magistrates Court, by the
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis.
Magistrates Court declared void as an error in law. And;
The Appellant's human rights have been breached. And;
The Appellant's right to due process has been breached.
And;
The Appellant's right to a fair trial has been breached. And;
Miscarriage of justice has been allowed to happen. And:
The Appellant's data protection act 1998 has been beached.
The decision/order to make the interim Antisocial Behaviour
Order a full Antisocial Behaviour Order on
04/08/2015
04th August 2015
by Highbury Corner Magistrates Court, by the
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis.
Magistrates Court declared void as an error in law. And;
The Appellant's human rights have been breached. And;
The Appellant's right to due process has been breached.
And;
The Appellant's right to a fair trial has been breached. And;
Miscarriage of justice has been allowed to happen. And;
The Appellant's data protection act 1998 has been beached.
The decision/order to dismiss the Appeal against conviction,
of the Antisocial Behaviour Order at Wood Green Crown
Court on
19/01/2017
19th January 2017.
Crown Court declared void as an error in law. And;
The Appellant's human rights have been breached. And;
The Appellant's right to due process has been breached.
And;
The Appellant's right to a fair trial has been breached. And;
Miscarriage of justice has been allowed to happen. And;
The Appellant's data protection act 1998 has been beached.
It is said that on the on the
12/09/2014
12th September 2014
the police attended The Appellant home address of 109
Burncroft, Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JQ, they knocked on the
door, The Appellant was not expecting anyone, The
Appellant approached his front door and looked through his
spy hole he could see clearly see was the police, and asked
them through the door what they wanted, the police stated
they needed to speak to him, The Appellant opened his front