Page 226 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

22/10/2014
for an interim Antisocial Behaviour Order hearing, all police
officers were due to attend for the interim hearing.
On the
22/10/2014
22nd October 2014
The Appellant was due in Court for the Interim Antisocial
Behaviour Order to be heard, due to The Appellant barrister
having a burst water pipe and his home being flooded he
could not attend, the applicant still wanted the case to be
heard which the Judge would not allow. The Interim
Antisocial Behaviour Order hearing was then set for the
05/11/2014
05/11/2014
On the
22/10/2014
22 October 2014
all police officers did attend Court for the Interim Antisocial
Behaviour Order hearing. Disclosure was asked for on this
date. On
05/11/2014
05th November 2014
The Appellant was due in Court for the Interim Antisocial
Behaviour Order hearing, all police was due to attend but did
not. The Appellant's barrister could not attend on this date
due to the flooding that taken place at his home address,
another barrister turned up to represent The Appellant but
had no paperwork for the case only a skeleton argument to
strike-out the Antisocial Behaviour Order application. The
skeleton argument, submitted on behalf of The Appellant, to
strike-out the application for the Interim Antisocial
Behaviour Order. Arguments advanced in this respect, and
those which rely upon the civil procedure rules, are not
applicable to these proceedings. The civil procedure rules
only apply to proceedings in the county Court, the high
Court and the civil division of the Court of Appeal. As a
result, the Magistrate’s Court has no jurisdiction to consider
an application to strike-out application. The Interim
Antisocial Behaviour Order hearing went ahead, The
Appellant's barrister did not have the correct paperwork for
the hearing, and knew very little about the case, no police
officers turned up to Court on this day. In the days prior to
this hearing The Appellant was rushed into hospital due to
kidney problems while he was still in hospital, he was
informed by his solicitor on the
04/11/2014
that if he did not attend Court on the
05/11/2014