Page 228 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

as defined by s.63(1) of the criminal justice and public order
act 1994; Entering or remaining in any disused or abandoned
building unless invited to do so in writing by a registered
charitable organisation; Entering or remaining on non-
residential private property on an industrial estate between
the hours of 10pm and 7am without written permission from
the owner and/or leaseholder of the property; and Engaging
in any licensable activity’s in any unlicensed premises.
Clearly these conditions The Appellant was put under are a
breach of The Appellant’s human rights, and
disproportionate due to the fact it would breach:
Article 3 freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading
treatment
Article 5 right to liberty and security
Article 8 respect for your private and family life, home and
correspondence
Article 23.1; of the universal declaration of human rights
states: (1) everyone has the right to work, to free choice of
employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and
to protection against unemployment.
Condition E states entering or remaining on non-residential
private property on an industrial estate between the hours of
10 pm and 7 am without written permission from the owner
and/or leaseholder of the property.
With this condition in place any non-residential property
The Appellant would not be able to attend:
Would include Hospitals, Police Stations, 24-hour
Supermarkets, Petrol Stations, Cinemas, Restaurants, Bars,
Nightclubs and any other public place open to the public
between these times that is non-residential The Appellant
cannot go to without written permission which would be
degrading for The Appellant to have to ask each time he
wanted to go somewhere and explain why he needed it to be
confirmed in writing by the owner and/or leaseholder of the
property, how this condition could be applied by any Judge
and state it is not a beach of someone human rights is
beyond me. Conditions C states knowingly using or
supplying property personal or otherwise for the use of a
rave as defined under section 63.1 of the criminal justice and
public order act,
The Appellants has spent the last 10 years building his
business saving every penny and help from family it is
within the entertainment industry, he will hires equipment
out, The Appellants business would seriously be affected,
because if he hired his equipment and it ended up in an
illegal rave The Appellant would be in breach of the
conditions. When hiring out equipment you do asked what is
going to be used for, and you do have a contract that is in
place, but what the person tells you their reason for hiring
the equipment out is not always the correct reason and is not