Page 229 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

used for the purpose the person told you The Appellant
would be in breach of these conditions also if the Appellant
loaned someone any personal belongings and that person
ended up at an illegal rave then The Appellant would again
be in breach of his conditions, even if the item was
something that did not even constitute as being for an illegal
rave. These are just two of the concerns with the conditions
that the Appellant is under; there is other concerns with
other conditions set at by the Courts that are of concern.
Also breached within this hearing was the Appellant’s
Article 6 right to a fair trial
The Appellant had to go ahead with his hearing without the
barrister having any other paperwork other than the
application to strike-out which was not allowed. The police
officers not attending when they knew they should.
The Appellant being so unwell he was not coping he should
never have had to discharge himself from hospital to try to
defend himself. The police having it on the police systems
who done what they say The Appellant has done and would
not disclose that information. The following directions were
made: The parties to exchange any additional evidence on
which they seek to rely by
20/01/2015
20th January 2015
This is to include any witness statements from any witness,
including the defendant himself; and the parties are
prohibited from relying on any evidence not already served,
or served in accordance with paragraph 1 of these directions,
without the permission of the Court. Although not a formal
direction, should any witnesses no longer be required, the
Judge requested written confirmation of this to be given to
all parties speedily. At present, the following witnesses are
required to attend the full hearing:
• Inspector Douglas Skinner;
• Police constable Miles;
• Acting police sergeant Edgoose;
• Police constable Elsmore;
• Sergeant King;
• Police constable Ames; and
• Inspector Hamill;
The interim order is to continue until
10/03/2015
10th march 2015
when the full hearing would be heard this was listed for two
full days. Disclosure was asked for this was meant to be
given by
20/01/2015
this never happened and no disclosure was given. No
disclosure was served on us by the
20/01/2015