Page 225 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

door very slightly the police stated they needed to serve
some documents on him, due to The Appellant's learning
difficulties he stated he would not accept anything and
closed his door and stated he was not being rude in doing so.
It is a well-known fact on the police's system of government
bodies that The Appellant does have learning difficulties and
health problems. The Appellant could hear the police talking
outside and the lady police officer said what we are going to
do now. A male police officer stated put it on the floor in
front of the door. They then took some pages out of the A4
size folder and put them in to The Appellant's letterbox this
was four pages. The A4 size folder the lady police officer
placed it on the floor in front of The Appellant's front door.
The Appellant's mother could not attend The Appellant's
address that day to pick the file up due to a death in the
family, she attended The Appellant's home address the next
day, the folder was opened on the floor where the police had
left it. The Appellant's mother was very shocked when she
looked inside the folder and saw the data that was within it.
The data that was within side the A4 size folder was
personal information and a breach of the data protection act
1998 by leaving such data in a commune area of the block of
flats. A letter of complaint was put to the police in the way
in which they had left personal information on a door step in
view of everyone that lived or who came in to the block of
flats, on the
13/09/2014
13 September 2014
to Edmonton Green police station, at the same time the
complaint letter was handed in so was the A4 bundle.
The complaint has never been addressed and has never had a
response from the police who left personal information on a
front door step which is a breach of data protection act due
to the contents held within the A4 size bundle. Please see
letter of complaint and photos and receipt that was handed to
Edmonton police station on
13/09/2014
13th September 2014
On
06/10/2014
06th October 2014
The Appellant was due to appear in Court this day, The
Appellant had solicitors in place, Michael Carroll and Co
Solicitors, legal aid had been applied for, but the legal aid
had been refused, the Judge sitting overturned this and
granted legal aid. The reason for the Judge overturning and
granting legal aid was due to The Appellant having known
learning difficulties, health problems and due to the
complexity of the case. Disclosure was asked for, but no
disclosure ever came. The case was relisted for the