Page 249 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

important it was that all the bundles were paginated and
indexed correctly and the same that each person was
working from, The Appellant mother knew there was
problems as multiple documents had been handed to the
Court which she did not know if they had been patronised
correctly or indexed into The Appellant’s bundle that the
court and the Respondent were using also the Appellant
mother spent all weekend trying to add missing documents
to The Appellant’s bundle and making copies so that when
we got to Court on the
26/09/2016
that these could be added to the Respondent bundle and the
three Judge’s bundles. The Appellant health had become
very unstable due to him knowing that he was going to have
to be dealing with this himself. The Appellant mother also
spent part of the weekend also writing a letter to the Judge in
regards to what had gone on and breaches in The
Appellant’s human rights mainly he’s article 6 rights to a
fair trial, there was also a list of things that had gone on
throughout the case since 2014 in regards to the
nondisclosure, and other issues that was always being raised
when at Court and the reason as to why legal aid had been
granted: Due to the complexity of the case. Due to The
Appellant’s learning difficulties. Due to the concerns of The
Appellant health. This letter was emailed to the Court and
asked to be passed to the Judge. Please see letter that was
emailed to the judge the
26/09/2016
26 September 2016
the three-day Appeal hearing was due to start The Appellant
was so unwell that there was no way he could attend Court,
Mr A Cordell and Miss L Cordell attended Court to speak to
the Judge. When the Judge entered the Courtroom, he stated
that he had had a letter that had to be addressed, he stated
that he felt this would go to judicial review, he stated he had
three options: Carry on with the Appeal in the hope The
Appellant would turn up the following day. Dismiss the
Appeal. Adjourn the Appeal to a new date. The Judge went
over the letter in great detail; he stated around five times that
he felt this was going to go to judicial review. The Judge
decided to adjourn the case until the
16/01/2017
this was later changed for the Appeal to start on the
17/01/2017
The Respondent had tried to object to the Appeal being
adjourned. The Judge stated that we should try to find a new
solicitor to take on the Appeal and that he would help and
also make sure that legal aid was in place. The Judge asked
why The Appellant was not in Court. The Appellant mother
stated The Appellant had become so unwell due to what was