Page 154 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table

exhibit proof of my insurance as exhibit SC/4. A police officer gave incorrect evidence in court that he had
not taken my vehicle because there were tools in it; however, he had made an inconsistent statement
previously saying that there were tools in the van. I exhibit proof of this incident as exhibits SC/5, a witness
statement authenticating the sound recordings I have submitted, exhibit SC/6, transcripts of sound
recordings of conversations with police personnel and my insurance company, and exhibit SC/7, a sound
recording of a phone call from a police officer to my insurance company, and exhibit SC/8, a further sound
recording of a phone call between the insurance company and the police car pound. I was convicted of
driving without insurance on the basis of his evidence. I am appealing against conviction on the basis that
the police officer gave incorrect evidence to court. My insurance company has provided me with a letter of
indemnity and witness statement in this respect; however, I am currently banned from driving as a result of
the officer’s incorrect evidence. I exhibit the clerk’s notes from the Magistrates Court trial verifying that the
police officer told the court that my Van had not been seized because of there being tools in the Van, and a
covering email from Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, as exhibit SC/9, and I exhibit proof that I am
currently banned from driving as exhibit SC/10. I had a legitimate reason for being at White Sands
Nightclub as I was discussing becoming entertainment manager for White Sands Nightclub; I was going to
see a friend about the possibility of a job interview. My van was empty on the date in question.
I accept that I own entertainment equipment. I have acquired these for my company. I am trying to build a
company, and the aim was to rent the equipment out to people. I have prepared draft terms and conditions
of business that I exhibit as SC/11. I was trying to hire the equipment out to conferences, school fates, local
community events, private birthday parties until the stress became too
Signed
Witnessed By
03,
much. I would hire the equipment out to private parties, and to people who could provide me with sufficient
identification, and who could cover any damage to the equipment.
I have worked and attempted to work with charitable organizations, in particular Muswell Hill festival
helping kids with cerebral palsy, as well as the local scouts Ponders End festival, Lock to Lock festival,
Enfield Town Festival, Durant’s Park Festival. I am a member on the committee at my local community
hall, I have also been working alongside D.E.M.S event management service’s in aid of Bliss who are a
charity that helps premature babies. I have been building strong relationships with a view to developing a
running business helping make a positive effect of today’s people and society. I exhibit proof of my
business relationship with D.E.M.S as exhibit SC/12. I am very concerned that this application is damaging
my attempts to build a legitimate business by way of darkening my name and company brand. I had
arranged a community charity children’s fashion show fundraiser, and I exhibit proof of this in the form of
tickets that had been printed for the event as exhibit SC/13. However, this event did not go ahead as
planned as the stress of these ongoing proceedings meant I could not take part in it.
I am currently signed off from work due to problems that I am having. I exhibit proof of this in the form of
my doctor’s authorisation as exhibit SC/14. These proceedings have taken a large part in the deterioration
of my health, by way of the stress caused.
I will now comment on the incidents that I am alleged to have been involved in and that form the substance
of the complaint that has been laid against me.
I am alleged to have been involved in the organisation of and/or supplied equipment for and/or attended an
illegal rave at “Redacted Part Not Relevant to Day!”
On the 07th April 2013, I was going out with my friends and I had some off-road bikes in the back of my
van. I was looking forward to this day, and it had been arranged for a Sunday. We were waiting
Signed
Witnessed By
04,
at Ellesmore Road when the police stopped my van outside my friends. Ellesmore Road is a house on a
housing estate. I do not see how this is relevant to proceedings for an anti-social behaviour order; in
addition, the prosecution offered no evidence in respect of the charges that were brought even though they
were reliant on police witnesses. I had been wrongfully arrested for not having insurance when I was
insured to drive. I did not cause any Anti-Social Behaviour on the 7th April 2013.
“Redacted Part Not Relevant to Day!”05,